Tweet Information
@danielesesta
So much https://t.co/71vYBFmtCO
Final Decision
โ REJECTED
Final Score: 0
Confidence: 0
Reasoning:
- Score AI demasiado bajo: 2/10 < 6
Step 1: Basic Filters
โ Passed
โ Anti-retweet check: Passed
โ Length check: Passed
โ Anti-spam check: Passed
Reasons:
- โขAdequate length
- โขnot a retweet
- โขPassed anti-spam verification
Step 2: Engagement Analysis
โ Passed
Score: 664
Threshold: 3
Reasoning:
engagement total: 664 (489 likes + 30 RTs + 145 replies)
Step 3: Quality Analysis
โ Failed
Score: 2/10
Threshold: 6/10
AI Reasoning:
Analyzing the tweet in question: Originality and insight: The tweet is very brief, simply stating "So much https://t.co/71vYBFmtCO". There is no inherent originality or unique insight conveyed in this short statement. It is a vague, ambiguous comment without much depth. Rating: 2/5 Cultural significance or relevance: Without more context, it's difficult to assess the cultural significance or relevance of this tweet. The link shared could potentially point to something culturally significant, but the tweet itself does not provide enough information. Rating: 2/5 Potential to age well: The brevity and lack of specificity in this tweet make it unlikely to age particularly well. It does not contain any timeless wisdom or observations. The meaning could shift depending on the context of the linked content. Rating: 2/5 Intellectual depth or clever observation: This tweet does not demonstrate any intellectual depth or clever observation. It is a simple, surface-level statement without nuance or analysis. Rating: 2/5 Unique perspective or fresh take: There is nothing unique or fresh about the perspective presented in this tweet. It is a very generic, non-descript comment. Rating: 2/5 Literary quality or memorable phrasing: The phrasing is basic and unremarkable. There are no memorable turns of phrase or literary merit to this tweet. Rating: 2/5 Overall, this tweet does not meet the high bar for on-chain tokenization. It lacks originality, insight, cultural significance, intellectual depth, and literary quality. While the linked content could potentially be more valuable, the tweet itself does not provide enough context or substance to warrant preservation. /10
Analysis Metadata
Processing Time:
5152 ms
Agent Version:
1.0
Trigger Type:
AUTOMATIC_SEARCH